@ERJAN, OT Yes, and many of them, +100. It is from the docs from an internal project, which provide homogene access to various dbms'es. Where native support differs, or a SQL function is missing, functionality are tweaked so using popular SQL-functions return the exact same regardless of platform, that is what the gray tickmark indicate. The wizard takes advantage of the fact that GitHub allows img tags to occur in the README.md. Also, the wizard makes use of the popular trick of uploading images to GitHub by drag'n'dropping them in the issue area (as already mentioned in one of the answers in this thread).

We show rendered markup in several places on GitHub, most notably including a
Schwarzer neurology driver. project’s main README on the Repository page itself.

Starting today, GitHub supports relative links in markup files. Now you can
link directly between different documentation files, whether you view the
documentation on GitHub itself, or locally, using a different markup renderer.

You want examples of link definitions and how they work? Here’s some
Markdown for you. Instead of an absolute link:

…you can use a relative link:

and we’ll make sure it gets linked to user/repo/blob/branch/other_file.md.

Drivers rms. If you were using a workaround like [a workaround link](repo/blob/master/other_file.md),
you’ll have to update your documentation to use the new syntax.

This also means your documentation can now easily stand on its own, without always
pointing to GitHub.

If you want more information, we have a help article for you. Happy documenting!

Github Md Markup Program

Documentation.js Direction

Github Md Markup Calculator

Questions:

Github Md Markup Free

• Markdown or reST or Asciidoc or Asciidoctor?
  • References: https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/rustdoc-restructuredtext-vs-markdown/356/11https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29474
  • Markdown
    • Pros
      • More people know it already
      • Lots of good parsers
      • More documentation written in it
      • Same as rustdoc, JSDoc
    • Cons* No good way to interlink* Structure is arbitrary* No table standard
  • reST
    • Pros
      • Sphinx has lots of good documentation patterns
      • Standard table syntax
      • Lots of users: Sphinx is very very popular
      • Cons
        • Less popular
        • Fewer parsers
        • 'Hard to write', Directives behave strange, title syntax is annoying https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/rustdoc-restructuredtext-vs-markdown/356/18
• Asciidoc
• Asciidoctor
  • Pros
    • 'Asciidoctor is Markdown compatible and supports its basic syntax.'
  • Cons
    • Implementation is only written in Ruby

Personal take:

Github Md Markup Rate

• drock is a greenfield so we don't have the upgrade problems of rust. That's a potential point in the reST/asciidoc direction
• But the super limited range of implementations of reST is very troubling. It sounds like people only really like reST in the contest of Sphinx
• Having a pure JS solution is really top of mind, I do not want, in any way, to need to rely on another lang for a parser. But Sphinx goes way in the other direction and requires Python. Maybe that's fine.